Wednesday, August 1, 2007

Patriarch's Ponds


Any large city in the world has a neighborhood that is famous for its prestigious and affluent status. The city of Moscow is not an exception. It is full of beautiful and prestigious places. While walking through Moscow one can see various neighborhoods with distinctive history and characteristics that gives them a prestigious status. One of the most exclusive ones in modern Moscow is the neighborhood of Patriarch’s Ponds. The district of Patriarch’s Ponds has a rich historic background and cultural heritage. Historically it dates back to the eighteenth century when it fist appeared on the map of Moscow. In terms of culture, it has always attracted writers and people of arts up to modern days. In time the neighborhood has evolved not only into a cultural center, but also into a favorite place of Muscovites to meet and spend their leisure time. The focus of this essay will be on the main characteristics of the neighborhood of Patriarch’s Ponds. It will include the area’s historic significance and cultural role up to present day Moscow.

Patriarch’s Ponds! The name itself suggests a historical value to the place. From the time of Boris Godunov the lands of Patriarch’s Ponds were given to the Muscovite Patriarchs of the Russian Orthodox Church. Before that it was called Goat’s Sloboda, and then it became Patriarchshaya Sloboda, which is the origin of the modern name. The area of Patriarch’s Ponds is located in the main Garden Circle, which are the old borders of the city. Modern Moscow has three rings that serve as highways, but before the twentieth century Moscow had only one ring which is the Garden Ring. Back in seventeen century in the period of Muscovite Principalities the borders of the city were defined by the walls of the fortresses that surrounded the city. Therefore the appearance of the rings is the main track to observe the city’s development territorially. The Patriarch’s Ponds are located inside the Garden Ring which nowadays categorizes the area to the downtown area. It is located in a well-kept district between Tverskoy Boulevard and Garden Ring.

Until the early twentieth century Patriarch’s Ponds was one of the dozen ponds in the city that provided water for agricultural activities.[1] In a way the pond is reminder of not so long Moscow’s rural past. The interesting transformation of Patriarch’s Ponds is that it has become an area in Moscow that is far away from being connected to anything rural. Even though the plurality of the name implies presence of several ponds currently there is only one pond remaining out of three. Throughout the development of the city and the need for new constructions had left only one pond remaining. The water of the ponds was known to have a therapeutic quality as well as some sort of superficial power. In the seventeenth century the ponds were used to raise fish for the Patriarch Nikon.[2] The presence of three ponds is also the reason of the name of the Trekhprudni Pereulok (Three Pond Lane) that is right around the main Patriarch’s Pond. By 1831, the area around the pond was cultivated and the landscape had gained number of trees. A nineteenth century guide to Moscow use to write that the place has become a pleasant route for walks and gatherings[3]. A tradition was formed to make family walks around the pond. Especially for children the pond has become a skating ground during winters, which by the end of the nineteenth century had become a property of the first Russian Gymnastic Society named Sokol. On a weekend evenings the park was being transformed into a stage for musical performances by Military Brass Band.

Present day Patriarch’s Pond is surrounded by building that were built after the Second World War by prominent architects. Most of them were built for the people of Nomenklatura, which were the Soviet elite. For example, the exclusive House of Lions that was built specially for World War Two marshals by celebrated Muscovite architect Zholtovsky. Shekhtel, another remarkable figure in Moscow’s architecture, build here the famous building of the Argentine Embassy, which is one of the most interesting models of Moscow’s modern style[4]. Another distinctive building is the yellow high-rise that was built for Soviet Aviators. It has a typical post-constructivist style that is characteristic to Muscovite architecture of early twentieth century. The buildings around the pond form a square that is like a calm island in the big city.[5]

The latest architectural addition to the square is the building erected during the post-Soviet period. It is built in resemblance to the model of a tower by famous Soviet architect Vladimir Tatlin. The tower is a utopian vision as a tribute to the communist regime. The original Tatlin’s Tower was called the Third International. It was never built by the Soviets due to its expansive cost of materials at a time when Soviet Union needed to recover after the First World War. An interesting aspect of the tower is also the resemblance of it to the bell tower of Novodevichi Convent in Moscow, where Tatlin’s Studio was placed on the second floor. [6] Subsequently, the appearance of the new residential building on Patriarch’s Ponds not only adds an esthetic value to the square, but also a controversial historic value. The luxurious apartments in the building are occupied by current representatives of Russian elite like Alla Pugacheva, the most adored Russian singer of all times.

In present days Patriarch’s Ponds is still a favorite place for Muscovites to spent time. The bath house built in nineteenth century is now converted into a fashionable restaurant that regularly hosts promotional parties. It is one of the most prestigious and expansive places to keep a residence in Moscow. It is also being promoted as a tourist site due to its cultural allure in the capital of Russia. It hosts a monument to Ivan Krylov, a beloved sable writer in Russian Literature. His Statue is surrounded by famous heroes from his sable’s that gives a special aura to the place.

Modern residents of the Patriarch Ponds are very fond of their historic land. In recent city’s planning there was a project that would put a huge iron stove as a monument in the honor Mikhail Bulgakov. A stove because it is a characteristic symbol of Soviet household and also a feature from the controversial novel Master and Margarita by Bulgakov. Eventually, residents have won the long battle against the notorious plan by the city hall. The protest was not directed towards the Bulgakov. It was the physical ugliness of the project that upset the people and also the inside political motivation within the Moscow’s city hall.[7]

The well known novel of Bulgakov Master and Margarita has immortalized the Patriarch’s Pond in its pages. Actually the novel that Bulgakov started to write in early nineteen twenties was published only after his death and after the death of Joseph Stalin.
The controversial novel begins with a scene that takes place on the Patriarch’s Pond. In the first chapter of the book, one of the characters, the young poet Bezdomny, which means “homeless” in Russian, meets up with Berlioz, a magazine editor, at Patriarch’s Ponds. Together they discuss the historical accuracy of Jesus’ life, when Voland, the devil, interrupts their conversation and tells them the story as he had witnessed. The paradox of the plot in relation to the pond is that its name already implies religious theme which is being confronted by the presence of the Devil. The theme of Jesus’ story is being portrayed throughout the novel, as well as the Devil’s visit to Moscow. In the period of early communism in Russia and during Stalin’s regime it was a huge risk to write anything of such nature. Perhaps Bulgakov chose specifically the Patriarch’s Ponds for the first appearance of Devil in Moscow in order to make it more daring and also to accentuate the magnetic quality of the pond. Or may be he himself also adored that neighborhood, since for a little while he was its resident.

The list of famous residents and visitors of Patriarch’s Ponds is endless. From its formation up to present days the neighborhood had attracted the wealthy and the celebrated. After the war and the fire of 1812 the neighborhood had started its new development. During that time famous writer Ivan Dmitriev had chosen the Patriarch’s Ponds as the place of his residence. His presence in the area brought many other writers and poets. Dmitriev was regularly visited by Karamzin, Vyazemsky, Pushkin, Jukovsky, and Bartynsky who also became a resident of Patriarch Ponds[8]. Together, Dmitriev and Bartinsky described their neighborhood as an area where the all the muses are warmly kept “Priut, sianiem muz sogreti”[9]. Among the famous visitors was also the great Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy, who regularly brought his daughters for a walk around the pond[10].
Starting from late nineteenth century, three generations of the well know actors of that period by the name of Sadovskich resided by the Patriarch’s Ponds. It is known that Olga Osipovna Sadovskich would take a tour around the pond in order to relax after tiring plays[11]. From the early twentieth century here resided the reformer of classical Russian ballet, A. A. Gorsky, who was appointed as a ballet master of imperial theatres. Famous Russian painters like Surikov, who never had his own studio, and Palenov spent quite a time painting simply standing by the pond. Other significant figures in the history of Russia and Moscow that are connected to the Patriarch Ponds are the family of famous scientists Sechenevs, who also resided on the Patriarch Ponds. Another famous resident of the ponds was the musician Ilya Sokolov, who had regular visits from famous composers that includes the magnificent Ferenz List. It was in this neighborhood where famous Russian poet of the Silver Age Alexander Blok chose to spend his only winter in Moscow. This is where young poet Mayakovski received his first apartment. Sitting by the pond with his friends, young Mayakovski was working on his first self made edition of poems called ‘poschetina obshestvennomu vkusu”[12]. Even though in life of Mayakovski it is a matter of minor significance, for Moscow’s cultural heritage it is a definitely a memorable detail. Another famous Russian writer Aleksey Tolstoy was writing about the neighborhood by calling it a magnetic place, a place that once visited attracts people over and over again[13]. In other words, throughout the formation of the neighborhood, its spirit was evolving with cultural significance.

During my stay in Moscow, decided to visit the infamous district of Patriarch’s Ponds. With a copy of Master and Margarita in my hand, I spent the entire day sitting on its legendary benches by constantly changing them so I could enjoy the view from different angles. I had a lunch in one of the many cozy cafes that surround the pond. I observed the people around me. Some were relaxing on the benches, just like me and others were walking with children. Some were just passing the pond, perhaps as apart of their daily routine. I saw a couple of young painters working by the pond, perhaps they are going to be as acknowledged one day as Surikov and Palenov are. Indeed, the square of Patriarch’s Pond is one of kind in Moscow. Like an oasis in a large busy city of rapid movements and changes, the pond reflects calmness like an asylum for its residence. I experienced its magnetic power, and if not the rain that started suddenly, I would probably sit there until nightfall.

[1] Ruble, Blair A.; Russia’s Colico Heart; in the second Metropolis: Pragmatic Pluralism in Gilded Age Chicago, Silver Age Moscow, and Meiji Osaka, , 2001 Cambridge University Press: 2001, p. 77
[2] Street Guide; http://www.moskva.ru/guide/streets/big_nikitskaya7e.html (available July 24th, 2007)
[3] Moleva, N. M.; Moskva-Stolitsa; Moscow: OLMA-Press, 2003; p. 384
[4] Moleva, p. 386
[5] Schlogel, Karl; Moscow; Munich: Reaktion Press, 2005; p. 118
[6] Schlogel, p. 305
[7] Balmforth, Richard, Literary site saved after residents’ protest, Johnson’s List: April 1, 2003; http://www.cdi.org/russia/johnson/7126-1.cfm (available July 24th, 2007)
[8] Moleva, p. 384
[9] Moleva, p. 384
[10] Moleva, p. 384
[11] Moleva, p. 385
[12] Moleva, p. 385
[13] Moleva, p. 385






Photograph are done by the author

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

Journal #4 Last impressions

I am writing this entry already outside of Moscow. As I think of that city I have an impression that I have spent my childhood there. At first, I couldn’t understand how to explain that feeling and why do I feel that way, since my childhood was in Yerevan, a city that does not have much in common with Moscow except for communist past.

As I was flying back in the plane I asked myself what have I learned about Moscow?
Right away my mind was full of impressions, experiences, stories, history, etc.
I tried to sort out most the fundamental knowledge about Moscow in specific. First of all throughout the program I realized that Moscow is very different from the rest of Russia. One can learn about Russia through Moscow, but impossible to learn about Moscow through Russia. It is a city with its unique mentality and characteristic.

The main stages that I can fix in the development of Moscow start by the Muscovite Principality, then the Mongol invasion, then the czarist and imperial Russia, the Napoleonic invasion, freedom from serfdom, period of industrialization, revolutions, communism and the current post-communist period. These are the main historic periods that have impacted the city of Moscow.

In this journal entry I will write about my observations of the impact of communism and post-communism on the city's architecture. The communist era, itself, has few stages in the Moscow’s architecture. It is easy to tell the difference in buildings from Stalin’s epoch and the Khrushev era. The buildings of the Stalin era are mostly built for the nomenclature; they are built from yellow brick and are big and beautiful. The buildings of Khrushev era are square and plain with poor quality. The buildings of the 70s and 80s don’t have much differentiation, they are high-rises that are plain and at times with ugly balconies. The post communist era had added new sub-urban territory to Moscow that much resemble to typical western suburban neighborhoods. It has also added typical modern high-tech style buildings that have added a new face to the multi faced Moscow.

It is safe to say that major shaping of the city took place during the communist era. It is the building of main roads, subway, which is one of the most efficient and complex in the world and unique due to its architectural value. In other words, Moscow’s subway has stations that are equivalent to a museum of Soviet history and legacy. One can wonder why the Soviets have built their subway in such way? It was very costly during that period and yet they had to create something to differ from other world cities. I find that it is a true Russian-Moscow quality to show off magnitude from the rest of non Russians or non-Moscovites. It is an inferiority that occured due to historical backwardness.

I should also mention that large amount of monuments were erected throughout the city to enhance the communist presence. The most popular one is the Lenin’s monument, which nowadays can be found rarely in the city. Currently, the majority of the Soviet monuments can be found in the park behind the Kremlin. Presently the city has numerous monuments dedicated to most random purposes. Starting from the gigantic monument to Peter the Great (I think that a monument to Peter the Great belongs only to St. Petersburg even though he had done a lot for Moscow too) with a mistake (one of the flags of the ship that he stands on has a wrong emblem) and continuing with monuments to fairy tale heroes in Alexandrovsky park ( I found that some of the heroes did not even belong to Russian fairly tales).

I guess I understood why I relate Moscow to the city of my childhood. When I look at buildings in my hometown, I see more than buildings, by looking closely I recognize the history that is behind it. The same phenomenon started to happen in Moscow. I learned to read the city of Moscow by looking at its streets, buildings and monuments. I learned its history through its architecture. I am very happy that I have spent part of my summer walking on the streets of a city that has become part of me, part of Moscow has become forever mine.

Saturday, June 23, 2007

Journal #3


Trip to Suzdal’

Our trip to Suzdal turned out to be a quite an interesting true Russian experience. I was looking forward to get away from Moscow hectic lifestyle with lots of pollution. The ride was exhausting due to traffic while leaving the city.

My first impression of Suzdal’ was of a small Russian town with active monasteries and around 300 churches (according to our local guide). Why so many monasteries and churches were built in Russia? Why religion played such an important role in this society back in 16th century? Later I was informed that not only religion play an important role on people’s spiritual life but it also compensated for material and social stability. Being a nun back in 1500’s meant an asylum from serfdom and a more or less stable materially life, which otherwise had to be reached through hard work.

The nature in Suzdal’ was exactly how I imagined Russia before coming here. The endless flat fields and the trees were creating a peaceful untouched environment.


































Our visit to the Museum of Wooden Architecture opened up my eyes to the ordinary life of ordinary (serfs) of Russians back in 18-19th centuries. The simple setting of interior and the presence of a huge oven/heater implied the uneasy life of villagers while surviving Russian winters. Russians of Suzdal don’t live, they survive hard climate!! It makes sense that in order to live in such harsh conditions one has to have a strong belief and loyalty to God and the Church. The strong religious lifestyle can be the only motivation in such circumstances and one can not avoid mentioning of the presence of plenty of Vodka as well, as a helping hand through surviving winter in Russia.

Our group had stayed in a convent overnight. It was my first ever time stepping into a convent and according to Russian tradition one should make a wish while entering a convent for the first time and it will come true. I belief everybody in our group made a wish!







Even though Suzdal is famous for its numerous Churches and monasteries, it was easy to trace the Soviet legacy in the town. The main street was named after V. I. Lenin. It also had the Monument of Lenin in the main Square (local Red Square) was standing in front a plain square building of a typical Soviet architecture of Kchrushev epoch, which represented the main governmental building in Suzdal.. It was easy to see a stopped construction of the top 5th floor. Perhaps right before the collapse of the USSR Suzdal’ was planned to be increased in its size? Our guide had mentioned that the population of Suzdal had no been changed since the 16th century. It must be fate!!






















Our last ours in Suzdal went by visiting the village of Bogolubovo again famous for its active convent, monasteries and church were Andrei Bogolubov, a Russian prince resided and was killed. The location where the Price had been murdered was closed by a fence. Flowers lay on the exact place where the prince died. Overall the place of the death was cherished as some place sacred. It reminded me of the Curch of Savior on Spilled Blood in St. Petersburg, which was built on the location where Alexander the 2nd was killed. His son Alexander the 3rd erected the church in his father’s memorial. Inside the church I remember seeing the visible pavement covered with flowers, it was the exact location of the emperor’s death. Russians have this incredible fascination with people who were killed by their enemies. It was also in Bogolubovo when I first time saw an icon depicting the royal family of Nicholas the 2nd as saints. Somehoe it did not seem to be right to me seeing children depicted as saints. I understand the entire tragedy of the murdering the last Russian Royal family, but converting them into saints! Why?? What good did they do to people?

I cannot avoid mentioning my unique experience in Bogolubovo, which I won’t forget for the rest of my life. I was confronted by nun! Yes!
As I was exiting the Church in Bogolubovo Monastery ( I should mention that all females were given head covers and skirts upon entering the church including myself) an old nun followed me. She asked me whether I have ever seen a male wearing a dress? ( Of coarse I have, but my instinct told me to comply and answer ‘no’ because that is what she wanted to hear) I answered "No" having no idea what she was going to say. Her reaction to my answer was the following, "There is something wrong with you since you are a female and yet you are wearing a male's clothing". The nun left me standing in the couryard absolutley shocked. The nun had left me in the courtyard absolutely shocked. I could not belief her aggression towards me, a total stranger. Her persona opposed to my image of a regular nun. She really made me feel like have done something bad.

Then in a second before I could realize what happened a group of nuns started to enter the church passing by me through the courtyard. They were lined from young to older ones. They wore black from head to toe. The amount of young nuns surprised me (second shock in regards my image of a nun). I asked our local guide what was the reason for so many young girls turning into nuns? She told me that she gets that question a lot and she has a universal answer to it which was that the reason is the God’s will! Her answer comforted me. I had realized that it is also God’s will that I wear jeans and that there is nothing wrong with me!

Tuesday, June 19, 2007